Why the White amendment is a good idea (fwd)

[Aaron Weissman]

On Thursday, September 25, 1997 12:00 PM, Lizard [SMTP:lizard at dnai.com] 
wrote:
> But to do that, you see, you'll need warrents, reasons for
> suspiscion, and, becuase of the effort involved, you'll only do it
> for serious crimes with a strong liklihood of conviction. *That* is
> the 'stauts quo' law enforcement *claims* to want.

and the technical realities of encryption, plus the limitations of any 
"NETCenter," will force a respect for, or at least compliance with, the 4th 
amendment.  Hooray!

Aaron