FW: Notification: Inbound Mail Failure

[Montgomery, Lynn]

Please remove dpeterson at jonescyber.com from your mailing list.  He is no
longer at this company.


-----Original Message-----
From:	Montgomery, Lynn 
Sent:	Tuesday, September 09, 1997 2:46 PM
To:	Montgomery, Lynn
Subject:	Notification: Inbound Mail Failure 

The following recipients did not receive the attached mail.  A NDR was
not sent to the originator for the following recipients for one of the
following reasons:

*	The Delivery Status Notification options did not request failure
notification, or requested no notification.
*	The message was of precedence bulk.



NDR reasons are listed with each recipient, along with the notification
requested for that recipient, or the precedence.
<dpeterson at jonescyber.com> dpeterson at jonescyber.com
		MSEXCH:IMS:JONES:CORPORATE:CEDAR 0 (000C05A6) Unknown
Recipient
		Precedence: bulk
The message that caused this notification was:

 


To: cypherpunks at toad.com
Subject: Letter sent to SJ Mercury staff on CA SJR-29 ...
From: Ernest Hua <hua at chromatic.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 1997 14:30:38 -0600
Cc: hua at chromatic.com

 Date: Tue, 9 Sep 1997 13:26:34 -0700 (PDT)
 From: Ernest Hua <hua at chromatic.com>
 To: business at sjmercury.com, computing at sjmercury.com,
state at sjmercury.com
 Subject: Why no coverage of CA resolution on Encryption?
 Cc: hua at chromatic.com
 
 Why was there no coverage of CA State resolution SJR-29?
 
 I find it using the search facility at:
 
     http://www.sen.ca.gov/www/leginfo/SearchText.html
 
 And the result is at:
 

http://www.sen.ca.gov/htbin/ca-billpage/SJR/29/gopher_root2:[bill.curren
t.sjr.from0000.sjr0029]
 
 The on-line magazine has a full article by Will Rodger on this:
 
     http://www.zdnet.com/intweek/daily/970908b.html
 
 Apparently there was some attempt by the Clinton Administration to
 cover up their lobbying effort.  I don't understand why the
 Administration would care about a California state RESOLUTION of all
 things.  Why does the Clinton Administration want to prevent a state
 legislature from speaking its mind?
 
 And what's with this attempt to claim "copyright" on that fax?
 
 Please get some answers on this!  The US Senate/House will be voting
 on important encryption legislation in the coming days.  The people of
 this country deserves to have a open, informed, serious discussion of
 one of the most important privacy issues of the information age.  We
 cannot afford to let a few intelligence and law enforcement agencies
 dictate policy TO us against our will.
 
 Ern