GMR in the talked-about form here would be unconstitutional

[mark at unicorn.com]

tcmay at got.net wrote:
 
> I agree that draconian crypto laws are afoot, but I don't discount the
> power of constitutional challenges.

That's probably true: that it's unconstitutional is almost certainly true,
that it would be overturned seems less certain.

The question is, is that grounds for complacency? I'd rather see people use
technology which can't be used against them than hope that such laws would
be overturned.

    Mark