CDA protects against liability

[Georgia Cracker Remailer Administrator]

On Thu, 2 Oct 1997, Declan McCullagh wrote:

> At 13:46 -0400 10/2/97, Anonymous wrote:
> >Another case where the CDA protected against liability.  Remailer ops
> >should look into this.
> >
> >http://www.wired.com/news/news/politics/story/7361.html:

This remailer-op, while not previously aware of the case, is well-aware of
that provision of the CDA, but has not yet had the need or opportunity to
use it as a legal defense. The reference is Public Law 104-104, Title V,
Subtitle A, Sec. 502 as it amends (47 U.S.C. 223). The text of this law is
available on-line at:

        http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c104:S.652.ENR:

My interpretation of this is: Anonymous remailers are internet service
providers.

--
For information on this anonymous remailing system, send the subject
"remailer-help" to <remailer at anon.efga.org> or visit our web pages at
http://anon.efga.org/anon/. To contact the operator directly, send mail
to <admin at anon.efga.org>. For general information and discussion about
anonymous remailers, send a message with "subscribe" in the body to
<remailer-politics-request at server1.efga.org>.