encryption laws (fwd)

frissell at panix.com frissell at panix.com
Wed May 21 05:00:36 PDT 1997


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

>If they had reasonable cause to believe you had knowledge of the key and
>were refusing to divulge it under direct order of the court you would be
>held in contempt until you were very old and gray.
>
>
>                                                 Jim Choate
>                                                 CyberTects
>                                                 ravage at ssz.com


Two years max.  A lot less time if you followed my strategy of spamming the 
court with daily (hourly?) screeds in which you assert in your finest Usenet 
flame language the fact that you will never follow the judge's order.

DCF
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 5.0 beta
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM4LgXoVO4r4sgSPhAQHb9wP/Z3kGQLC/vWyFqQe0hFZ/Jimh6x6pC8Ul
ERRbNcK9l60G6AJhpoqEr0KNA6VubjJkCVbIxzA+xYqVK3fCt6fzXhpUCkX9XId3
QOO+z1aUPSLUSozsNrJ5KUUUq9bLA28rytFsd5TdMM7gd2GtyOnQtUozDhZ5q5JK
uFjtt+DYQjw=
=ycw5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----







More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list