NoneRe: Receiving Messages Anonymously
Anonymous
nobody at REPLAY.COM
Wed Jun 18 21:32:36 PDT 1997
pdh at best.com (Peter Hendrickson) wrote:
> Receiving anonymous messages is still an open problem. The solutions
> we have so far are cumbersome to operate. They also depend on a chain
> of machines remaining up and reliable for a long time, which is
> expensive.
>
> A quick solution is to use the list to send anonymous messages. It is
> inexpensive to tell if a message is encrypted for a key you control so
> it is cheap to find messages you can read.
An anonymous message pool. How is this different from posting to
alt.anonymous.messages? (Other than it would annoy list readers. :)
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list