Responses to "Spam costs and questions" (long)
Declan McCullagh
declan at pathfinder.com
Fri Jun 6 19:53:20 PDT 1997
So we do agree after all!
-Declan
(Who thinks that no consensual speech should be banned by the government.
I can, however, see a common law argument for spam as trespass after
repeated cease-and-desist notes are sent.)
On Fri, 6 Jun 1997, Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM wrote:
> Declan McCullagh <declan at pathfinder.com> writes:
> > I suspect we agree on spam.)
>
> I kind of doubt it.
>
> Do you believe, as I do, that "spam" deserves the protection as any other kind
> of speech, and that so libel, child pornography, and bolb-making instructions?
>
> I didn't think so. :-)
>
> ---
>
> Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
> Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps
>
>
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list