Responses to "Spam costs and questions" (long)

Declan McCullagh declan at pathfinder.com
Fri Jun 6 08:31:06 PDT 1997



I believe I received your response after I compiled the list.

I disagree with most of the folks below, but I included their positions
nevertheless. (Anyway, I suspect we agree on spam.)

-Declan



On Fri, 6 Jun 1997, Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM wrote:

> Declan McCullagh <declan at well.com> writes:
> 
> > Yesterday I forwarded questions about spam from a friend who was speaking
> > before the FTC next week. Here are most of the replies I received, which
> > I've attached below. Some may have appeared here already.
> >
> > From: glee harrah cady <glee at netcom.com>
> > From: Wei Dai <weidai at eskimo.com>
> > From: Stanton McCandlish <mech at eff.org>
> > From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm3 at chrysler.com>
> > From: "Halpert, James - DC" <jhalpert at pipermar.com>
> > From: Azeem Azhar <aja at economist.com>
> > From: Mark Grant <mark at unicorn.com>
> > From: Charlie Stross <charlie at public.antipope.org>
> > From: Bill Frantz <frantz at netcom.com>
> > From: "Shabbir J. Safdar" <shabbir at vtw.org>
> > From: djones at insight.dcss.McMaster.CA (David Jones)
> > From: wyang at ktel.osc.edu
> > From: clinton at annoy.com (Clinton at Annoy)
> > From: Eric Murray <ericm at lne.com>
> > From: Ray Everett-Church <ray at everett.org>
> > From: Chris Poupart <jyhad at odyssee.net>
> > From: "Marius  Loots" <MLOOTS at medic.up.ac.za>
> > From: Roger Bohn <Rbohn at UCSD.edu>
> >
> 
> Declan didn't like what I wrote, so he deleted it.
> Good journalism.
> 
> ---
> 
> Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
> Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps
> 
> 







More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list