Making Imaginary Sex Illegal

[Unprivileged user]

On Tue, 15 Jul 1997, Kent Crispin wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 15, 1997 at 12:25:55PM -0400, Unprivileged user wrote:
> > But to return to the cypher aspect, what about altering existing images so
> > that they are unidentifiable as to whether they are from real acts or
> > truly the products of an imagination.  Will we now need someone from the
> > government to certify the kiddie porn isn't real?
> 
> Yes, that's the logical next step -- Government Approved Porn (GAP).  
> Perhaps we could get Senator Hatch to sponsor a bill?
> 
> The constitutional implications are staggering.

Actually, Government Approved Kiddieporn, or GAK.  Isn't Hatch already for
GAK?

--- reply to tzeruch - at - ceddec - dot - com ---