Making Imaginary Sex Illegal

[Kent Crispin]

On Tue, Jul 15, 1997 at 12:25:55PM -0400, Unprivileged user wrote:
> But to return to the cypher aspect, what about altering existing images so
> that they are unidentifiable as to whether they are from real acts or
> truly the products of an imagination.  Will we now need someone from the
> government to certify the kiddie porn isn't real?

Yes, that's the logical next step -- Government Approved Porn (GAP).  
Perhaps we could get Senator Hatch to sponsor a bill?

The constitutional implications are staggering.

-- 
Kent Crispin				"No reason to get excited",
kent at songbird.com			the thief he kindly spoke...
PGP fingerprint:   B1 8B 72 ED 55 21 5E 44  61 F4 58 0F 72 10 65 55
http://songbird.com/kent/pgp_key.html