A comment on the censorship policy

[Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM]

OKSAS <oksas at asimov.montclair.edu> writes:

> On Thu, 30 Jan 1997, Anonymous wrote:
> > I cannot understand how some of my (accurate) criticisms of Sandfort's
> > censorhip polices---some in direct response to his own self-serving posts
> > declaring himself not to be a flamer himself---are not making it to the
> > "New and Improved Censored List," while inane posts from Toto, Thorn, and
> > someone named "Nurdane Oksas" are appearing.
> 
> 	WEll....that's not so bad ;)

I find Oksas's posts to be very interesting.  

> > (Oksas has the especially annoying habit of quoting entire posts and then
> > appending a one-line piece of completely list-irrelevant fluff. Also,
> 	Is it so annoying...? why did you read it to that point??? :)
> 	Why could you not be so anonymous and tell me?  My posts are
> 	a bit brief; Blancs' are far better, next time read hers.
> 
> > engaging in lovey-dovey posts with Vulis, who writes messages about how he
> > longs to see Oksas naked.)
> 
> 	Huh??  You are being a 'fluff' here ;)

"Anonymous" is lying - I never posted any such thing.  of course the
cocksuckr moderator passed on the "anon's" lies to the censored mailing
list, and I bet he's goingto auto-bounce my refutation to "flames"
- just as everyone had predicted.

> 	
> > This whole process is showing the worst of Sandfort's censorship policy.
> > 
> > (If this is dumped into the "Not suitable for Cypherpunks to read" list, I
> > urge those of you who see it to pass it on to the main list.)

If you don't like the sandfart's moderation policy, you can just read the
unedited list and institute your own moderation policy using 'procmail'.
That's pretty much what the sandfart does anyway. Fluff from people he likes
makes it to the censored list (like a request to jya's bot cc'd to the whole
censored list) whie anything I or Toto or Oksas say is auto-junked.

---

Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps