IMPORTANT: Additional information about UDCM.
Toto
toto at sk.sympatico.ca
Fri Jan 10 00:19:01 PST 1997
Mark M. wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Jan 1997 DataETRsch at aol.com wrote:
>
> > IN RESPONSE TO THE FLAME MAIL DATA RESEARCH HAS BEEN RECEIVING:
The 'flames' used as examples seemed to me to be nothing more than
valid questions regarding the DataETR's claims for their software.
(Big Hint / Questions from conferences with the word 'punks' in the
name are not likely to be accompanied by bowing gestures and
exclaimations of amazement at unsubstantiated claims).
> > 0.390625% is the best possible percentage. Are all of you out there
> > satisfied?
>
> Not especially. I'd still be interested in the design criteria used to develop
> this algorithm. Until you publish the full source and technical data, I will
> have to assume that the algorithm is insecure.
Keep in mind that many CypherPunks dream in numbers.
Toto
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list