some hashcash advocacy
Steve Schear
azur at netcom.com
Sat Aug 9 19:39:33 PDT 1997
At 4:53 PM -0700 8/8/97, Kent Crispin wrote:>I didn't read the code, but it
seems that the double spending
>protection is just local to the recipient (ie, there isn't a trusted
>central clearinghouse that checks against double spending on a global
>basis). Thus, a spammer could calculate postage for a message, then
>send 100000 copies.
My understanding is that value of hashcash postage is imtimately involved
with receptient email address, thus mass duplication is prohibited.
--Steve
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list