non-censorous spam control (was Re: Spam is Information?)

? the Platypus {aka David Formosa} dformosa at
Sat Aug 2 23:46:58 PDT 1997


On Sat, 2 Aug 1997, Steve Schear wrote:


> >Naturally, rich, indolent technologists tend to favor schemes that
> >will put them in control. :-)
> I can't fuly agree. In Europe, both communism and fascism started from the
> socialists (in fact, the fascist were called National Socialists)

The fascists called themselves Socialists for the same reson that the
main pro logging group calls themselfs _The Forest Protection Socity_ as a
returorical techneek to sucker peaple.


> and both accept the "... idea of a political party which embraces all 
> activities of the individual from the cradle to the grave, which claims
> to guide his views on everything, and which delights in making all
> problems questions of party...," F.A. Hayek, The Road to Surfdom.

Replace political party with free market and you get the econmic
reationalisum/thatureisum that has chocked socity.  The freandly socilisum
that both the GNU mannifesto and most of the net works on has no such
totalitarian tendencies.

- -- 
Please excuse my spelling as I suffer from agraphia see the url in my header. 
Never trust a country with more peaple then sheep.  ex-net.scum and proud
You Say To People "Throw Off Your Chains" And They Make New Chains For
Themselves? --Terry Pratchett

Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv


More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list