bulk postage fine (was Re: non-censorous spam control)

? the Platypus {aka David Formosa} dformosa at st.nepean.uws.edu.au
Sat Aug 2 17:50:10 PDT 1997



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Sat, 2 Aug 1997, Adam Back wrote:

> Next we choose a threshold say 1000 posts per day.  Seems hard to
> imagine anyone generating manually over 1000 emails per day.  That's
> more than 1 per minute for a 10 hour day.

I bet this mailing list generates traffic of that order.  I would not wish
to see legitimite mailing lists shut down to stop the spam.

The best soultion given so far is Cause's suggestion of modifying the fax
law so that we can sue the spammers.

- -- 
Please excuse my spelling as I suffer from agraphia see the url in my header. 
Never trust a country with more peaple then sheep.  ex-net.scum and proud
You Say To People "Throw Off Your Chains" And They Make New Chains For
Themselves? --Terry Pratchett

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM+OZaaQK0ynCmdStAQHwswP+PUSe66qf6Na6TdkrWwW3jWoorfqYIi5v
J6azAQ87dZuxMFqLuYrQ2eqq/701HNjhJdp8RcSfGEyPp4hx2wu7WwnKqCiX9HW/
7HRxJ6wkzc53DToKk6OmQp8heDJ45eFzqwVwaaItwe3P8BpN2szQiO/HXXBXDWYd
qsoP/J/GWI8=
=RugV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----







More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list