Feds reading this list, Jim Bell, and threats

[Kent Crispin]

On Fri, Apr 04, 1997 at 01:41:38PM -0500, John Young wrote:
> On Phil Hallam-Baker's rejoinder to Paul Bradley' defense of AP:
[...]

> Rushdie, hmm. Phil what mind-swill you elbow-tipping? Is Rushie not
> closer to Jim Bell than he is to you in challenging the arrogant mullahs
> of highly sophisticated armed thuggery. Who you shillinging for these 
> days, Crispin's bandits of the NLs?

Crispin shills for himself, not the NLs or any bandits or anyone else. 
Phil Hallam-Baker shills for Phil Hallam-Baker.  Jim Bell's advocacy
of armed thuggery speaks for itself. 

-- 
Kent Crispin				"No reason to get excited",
kent at songbird.com			the thief he kindly spoke...
PGP fingerprint:   B1 8B 72 ED 55 21 5E 44  61 F4 58 0F 72 10 65 55
http://songbird.com/kent/pgp_key.html