10 minute delay considered inconsequential

[Adamsc]

On Wed, 11 Sep 1996 22:50:22 -0700, Timothy C. May wrote:

>>I've always wondered if the makers of mailer software couldn't include a delay
>>option, so that, say, a message might be held for 10 minutes and then sent.
>>Imagine how many of the "Sorry about x; I meant y" posts we'd never see.
>
>I expect there would be little effect. I suspect most of us write articles,
>send them out, and only notice the mistakes, typos, whatever when they are
>pointed out.

True.  I guess what we need is an AI mailer that would do something like
"Message #324 is rather confusing - did you really mean x?".  Oh well. . .

# Chris Adams <adamsc at io-online.com> | http://www.io-online.com/adamsc/adamsc.htp
# cadams at acucobol.com | V.M. (619)515-4894
"I have never been able to figure out why anyone would want to play games on
a computer in any case when the whole system is a game.  Word processing,
spreadsheets, telecoms -- it's all a game.  And they pay you to play it."
	-- Duncan Frissell