IPG Algorith Broken!
Igor Chudov @ home
ichudov at algebra.com
Tue Nov 26 17:00:50 PST 1996
paul at fatmans.demon.co.uk wrote:
> Perfect is a better term. Strictly speaking it is because there is no
> finite unicity distance (the amount of ciphertext with which the
> cipher can theoretically be broken). So, stricly speaking, for a given
> message C and a prospective pad, P, out of a set of N pads which may
> or may not be correct:
>
> P(P|C) = N^-1
What does it mean?
- Igor.
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list