Censorship on cypherpunks?, from The Netly News
Rich Graves
rcgraves at ix.netcom.com
Sat Nov 16 21:11:40 PST 1996
Omegaman wrote:
>
> On Wed, 13 Nov 1996, Declan McCullagh wrote:
>
> > Yes, I understand this. It's quite obvious; being removed from the
> > subscriber list hasn't slowed Vulis at all. When I was writing the piece
> > Vulis seemed to have slowed his ad hominem attacks and instead was talking
> > about censorship (something that is within the charter of the list), but
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Actually, Declan, it's not. "info cypherpunks" in the body of a message to
> majordomo at toad.com yields the welcome message to the list -- the closest
> thing to a charter available. The subjects of censorship and free speech
> are neither mentioned nor alluded to anywhere within that document.
This is true.
Declan's "fight-censorship" list, though, is supposed to be about censorship,
and he's allowing no criticism of his positions there.
-rich
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list