Bruce's 'Why Cryptography Is Hard' is still draft

[Adam Shostack]

----- Forwarded message from Phil Agre -----

>From rre-request at weber.ucsd.edu  Sat Nov  9 05:16:00 1996
Resent-Date: Fri, 8 Nov 1996 20:50:17 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 1996 20:50:15 -0800 (PST)
From: Phil Agre <pagre at weber.ucsd.edu>
Message-Id: <199611090450.UAA27962 at weber.ucsd.edu>
To: rre at weber.ucsd.edu
Subject: notes
Resent-Message-ID: <"7C7uBC.A.H1G.I2Ahy"@weber>
Resent-From: rre at weber.ucsd.edu
Reply-To: rre-maintainers at weber.ucsd.edu
X-URL: http://communication.ucsd.edu/pagre/rre.html
X-Mailing-List: <rre at weber.ucsd.edu> archive/latest/1379
X-Loop: rre at weber.ucsd.edu
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: rre-request at weber.ucsd.edu


Notes on network computers, blind copies, democratic culture, monopolies,
and the idea of an Internet establishment...


As a periodic reminder, a Web archive of nearly all the RRE messages ever
sent can be found through  http://communication.ucsd.edu/pagre/rre.html


It turns out that the article on cryptography by Bruce Schneier that I
forwarded from the Risks Digest the other day was actually an unfinished
draft that Peter Neumann sent out by mistake.  Bruce asks that everyone
refrain from propagating that version around the net.

----- End of forwarded message from Phil Agre -----

-- 
"It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once."
					               -Hume