crosspost re remailers
jamesd at echeque.com
jamesd at echeque.com
Thu May 16 01:36:11 PDT 1996
At 10:30 PM 5/14/96 -0700, Rich Graves wrote:
> > I'd have thought that a remailer going down
> > because of political/legal pressure would raise more of a ruckus.
At 11:02 AM 5/15/96 -0700, Bill Frantz wrote:
> I thought the statement that remailers are supposed to be ephemeral
> and common was the answer.
Exactly so:
Some nyms are valuable, most are valueless by design. All remailers
should be valueless by design. The penet.fi remailer design is
unsatisfactory precisely because it penet.fi is valuable, hence a
target. If it gets shut down a lot of people lose their nyms,
causing much inconvenience.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
We have the right to defend ourselves | http://www.jim.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind |
of animals that we are. True law | James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the |
arbitrary power of the state. | jamesd at echeque.com
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list