PGP, Inc.

Lucky Green shamrock at netcom.com
Wed May 8 15:04:51 PDT 1996


At 7:46 5/7/96, Raph Levien wrote:
[...]
>   The S/MIME spec indicates the use of X.509v3 certificates, which, in
>turn, are explicitly allowed to contain trust roots originating in the
>client's local configuration. In other words, yes, the spec allows for a
>Web of trust.
>   The big question, of course, is how easy the key management will be
>in such a case. Everything I've seen points to key management being
>super-easy if you use VeriSign certs, and probably just as bad as PGP
>otherwise. Unlike PGP, most e-mail clients will probably not come
>configured with the capablity to sign other keys - in the X.500 world,
>e-mail clients and "certification authorities" are two separate
>applications.

Since VeriSign is going to issue certs for nyms for free, the only
requirement being uniqueness, using their certs might not prove much of a
problem.


Disclaimer: My opinions are my own, not those of my employer.

-- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock at netcom.com>
   PGP encrypted mail preferred.








More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list