How's that again?

[jamesd at echeque.com]

At 11:37 PM 3/12/96 -0800, Bill Stewart wrote:
> I guess it's no surprise that one of the more-or-less "good guys"
> in the Senate can propose a law so ambiguously worded that it
> looks good on the face until a good lawyer takes the time to rip
> it apart

Looking for "good guys" in Washington is like Ronald Reagan looking 
for "moderates" in Iran.  On crypto, and on taxes, our interests 
and their their interests are completely opposed.  We should not 
care about, or take any interest in, the slight difference between 
the "moderate" and extremist members of the Senate and the House 
of Representatives.


The best bill we can ever hope to get out of Washington is no
bill at all.
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
              				|  
We have the right to defend ourselves	|   http://www.jim.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind	|  
of animals that we are. True law	|   James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the	|  
arbitrary power of the state.		|   jamesd at echeque.com