RFD: Time to kick some anti-scientologist ass?

jamesd at echeque.com jamesd at echeque.com
Sat Jun 8 16:06:45 PDT 1996



"Declan B. McCullagh" <declan+ at CMU.EDU> writes:
>> The attached summary is substantially incorrect.

At 12:29 PM 6/8/96 EDT, Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM wrote:
>You mean, the anti-scientologists aren't massively forging cancels
>for scientologits' posts on alt.religion.scientology using my cancelbot?

No:  He means that the anti-scientologists are massively forging
cancels of robotically generated spam produced by the scientologists
in an effort to close down the alt.religion.scientology newsgroup.


 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
              				|  
We have the right to defend ourselves	|   http://www.jim.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind	|  
of animals that we are. True law	|   James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the	|  
arbitrary power of the state.		|   jamesd at echeque.com







More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list