Banning Anonymity As Well (was Re: How I Would Ban Strong Crypto

Bill Stewart stewarts at ix.netcom.com
Thu Jul 18 02:16:26 PDT 1996


>> Also, the key which decodes the GAKed data is just too valuable and too
>> easy to steal.
>
>Assuming the info is encrypted with one GAK key, yes.  There might be 
>a series of keys, perhaps for each escrow agency, or an id-number 
>that identifies the key.

I predict that the "Access requires two master key agents" feature that
Clipper I pretended to have* gets lost along the way.  It wasn't in
Steve Walker's software key-gakking system that he and Dorothy were
touting a year or so ago, and it's a bit of work to actually implement
in software depending on the encryption methods used.

[* The Clipper I chip didn't actually implement dual GAK agents,
though it could have without much extra effort; that was all part
of the process of loading the chip's master-key in the vault charade,
and could therefore be easily changed later... ]

#				Thanks;  Bill
# Bill Stewart +1-415-442-2215 stewarts at ix.netcom.com
# http://www.idiom.com/~wcs
#				Confuse Authority!







More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list