I at Week on crypto export loophole 6/24/96

[jim bell]

At 03:05 PM 7/12/96 -0400, Will Rodger wrote:

>>As I see it, the most important issue is not the legal status of the one 
>>actually doing the export/mailing, but in fact the organization which is the 
>>recipient and thus, the beneficiary of this act.  _THAT_ organization will 
>>be well-identified, yet will not have done anything obviously illegal.  Is 
>>there any indication that Baker was trying to distinguish between the one 
>>physically mailing it, and those receiving it?
>
>Yup. He was speaking only of the US company.

Any indication about what the USG might be able to do, SPECIFICALLY, legally 
or in retaliation?

Jim Bell
jimbell at pacifier.com