What remains to be done.

[Black Unicorn]

On Thu, 4 Jul 1996, Gary Howland wrote:

> Black Unicorn wrote:
> > 
> > A.  Methods to run secure websites on insecure servers.

[...]

> I fully agree with all of your comments, but, encrypted proxying issues
> aside, what is wrong with SSL?  Is it because the encryption is for
> the whole server, not individual users?

It provides no protection to the individual who must run on a server he
does not have in a secure location with TEMPEST specs.

> > Is anyone considering work on these?

> With regard to the local decryption idea, then I don't see this as
> much of a problem.  How much interest is there in this?  We already
> have something similar running, but it would still need a bit of work
> to make more general.

What do you have running exactly?

> 
> Gary
> --
> pub  1024/C001D00D 1996/01/22  Gary Howland <gary at systemics.com>
> Key fingerprint =  0C FB 60 61 4D 3B 24 7D  1C 89 1D BE 1F EE 09 06
>