Lack of PGP signatures

[Perry E. Metzger]

"David F. Ogren" writes:
> Atkins) do not seem to PGP clearsign their messages to this list. In fact, 
> a surprisingly small percentage of messages on the C-punk list are signed. 
> This despite the fact that the average subscriber is at least literate in 
> PGP.
> 
> Does anybody have any speculation on why this is?

I'd say this is it:

> Is it because most mail programs are not PGP aware?