Spamming
Vipul Ved Prakash
vipul at pobox.com
Thu Aug 22 14:46:13 PDT 1996
>
> At 06:09 PM 8/20/96 -0700, Rich Graves wrote:
<Snip>
> No. I think we can all (most) agree that spam-email is like junk-snailmail.
> In that case there are a few things to consider:
>
> 1. Junkmail requires the SENDER to pay for it, not the recipient.
Internet pricing models are complicated and debatable, but you surely
end up paying for snail-junk-mail. Not directly, but hidden in the high
first-class mail costs. More mail, more infrastructure, higher costs.
This could be quite true for the net also, if we consider bandwidth costs
money.
Vipul
--
Vipul Ved Prakash Voice 91 11 2247802
<vipul at pobox.com> Fax 91 11 3328849
198 Madhuban, IP Extension, Delhi 110 092, INDIA
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list