Is 1024-bit PGP key enough?

Paul J. Bell pjb at ny.ubs.com
Fri Aug 2 12:37:42 PDT 1996


actually, the IDEA key is 128 bits.
	-paul

> From cypherpunks-errors at toad.com Fri Aug  2 03:06:24 1996
> X-Sender: gcg at mail.pb.net
> X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.2 (32)
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type> : > text/plain> ; > charset="us-ascii"> 
> Date: Thu, 01 Aug 1996 22:16:06 -0400
> To: jim at ACM.ORG
> From: "Geoffrey C. Grabow" <gcg at pb.net>
> Subject: Re: Is 1024-bit PGP key enough? 
> Cc: cypherpunks at toad.com
> Sender: owner-cypherpunks at toad.com
> Content-Length: 1454
> 
> At 15:38 08/01/96 PDT, Jim Gillogly wrote:
> >
> >Somebody says:
> >>> Is security provided by 1024-bit PGP key sufficient against most powerful
> >>> computers that are available today? Say if smoe organization spent 10
> >>> billions of dollars on a cracking machine, would it be possible to crack 
> >>> the keys in reasonable time?
> >
> >Derek Atkins <warlord at MIT.EDU> responds with some useful and authoritative
> >information -- thanks.
> >
> Also, remember that although the PGP key is 1024 bits, it generates a much
> smaller IDEA key with 56 bits (I think... anyone?).  The 56 bit key is
> vunerable to that $1 mil mystery machine that the NSA may or may not have.
>  
>                                                      G.C.G.
> 
>  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>  | Geoffrey C. Grabow       |      Great people talk about ideas.       |
>  | Oyster Bay, New York     |     Average people talk about things.     |
>  | gcg at pb.net               |      Small people talk about people.      |
>  |----------------------------------------------------------------------|
>  |     PGP 2.6.2 public key available at http://www.pb.net/~wizard      | 
>  |          and on a plethora of key servers around the world.          |
>  |----------------------------------------------------------------------|
>  | That which does not kill us, makes us stranger.   - Trevor Goodchild |
>  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> 






More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list