(Fwd)

[anonymous-remailer at shell.portal.com]

------- Forwarded Message Follows -------
Date:          Thu, 18 Apr 1996 10:01:03 -0500
From:          Al Thompson <alt at iquest.net>
To:            Multiple recipients of list NEWS <NEWS at AEN.ORG>
Subject:       


(Check out this excerpt from the recent committee report on S735.
Here's the header info.  -AT)


[Congressional Record: April 17, 1996 (Senate)]
[Page S3454-S3478]
>From the Congressional Record Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]


 
              TERRORISM PREVENTION ACT--CONFERENCE REPORT

  The Senate continued with the consideration of the conference report.

(A bunch deleted.  Here's one of the interesting parts  -AT)

  Mr. BIDEN. Mr. President, what I would like to speak to in an
indirect way covers this. We have had several votes on wiretaps, and
I know people are asking why am I introducing the other wiretap
provision that was taken out of the Senate bill. The reason I am is
I refuse to believe that, if you all hear this enough, you will not
eventually decide to do the right thing on this.

  The provision that I have proposed is not original with me. It was
in the Senate bill that we passed. The provision would add a
number--the bill we have before us, the conference report--would add
a number of terrorism-related offenses to the law. I will go into
those in a minute. What I have sent to the desk, if adopted, would
instruct the conferees to add the same number of offenses that we
are adding to the bill, to the law, to those categories of things
for which the Government, with probable cause, can get a wiretap. It
was in the Senate bill as introduced by Senators Hatch and Dole. It
was part of the terrorism bill reported out of Representative Hyde's
Judiciary Committee. Unfortunately, by the time the bill had made it
to the House, the provision was dropped.

  I think it is worth talking a moment about how a wiretap statute
works, the one that is in place now in the law, for it seems there
is a lot of misunderstanding about it these days. I am repeating
myself again to eliminate the misunderstanding. As some people tell
it, you would think the FBI and BATF and the local and State police
are tapping our phones left and right, that they are riding down the
streets in vans with electronic devices eavesdropping into our
windows and houses--which they have the capacity to do, by the way.