e$ seigniorage (and is this the cost of untracability?)

Jonathon Blake grafolog at netcom.com
Sun Apr 7 13:17:44 PDT 1996


	Jonathan:

On Sun, 7 Apr 1996 JonWienke at aol.com wrote:

> Interest-bearing accounts cannot legally be anonymous--the IRS requires

	To quote TCMay:
	National boundaries aren't even speedbumps on the information
	highway.

	Who says the e$ has to be based in the US?

	Andorra, Liechenstein, San Marino, St Pierre, all come 
	to mind as countries to investigate, because they are 
	outside of the United States.  << Has St Pierre joined
	NAFTA? If so, that rules them out.  >> 

        xan

        jonathon
        grafolog at netcom.com




**********************************************************************
*								     *
*	Opinions expressed don't necessarily reflect my own views.   *
*								     *
*	There is no way that they can be construed to represent      *
*	any organization's views.				     *
*								     *
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
*	ftp://ftp.netcom.com/pub/gr/graphology/home.html	     *
*								     *
***********************************************************************








More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list