Munitions shirt (again)

[Michael Shields]

> There is nothing in the ITAR that refers to ``machine-readable'' so
> there is no need to interpret that term.  

The issue is that it has been formally used as the criterion that
distinguishes "technical data" from "defense articles".  See Phil Karn's
CJ requests on the _Applied Crypography_ book and floppy.

<URL:ftp://ftp.cygnus.com/pub/export/>
-- 
Shields.