Cylink
Andrew Loewenstern
andrew_loewenstern at il.us.swissbank.com
Tue Sep 19 15:10:11 PDT 1995
anonymous claims the WSJ said:
> The arbitrators ruled that RSA hasn't had the right to sublicense
> the Stanford patents since 1990.
>
> Cylink said it would seek royalties from companies that have licensed
> software code from RSA and are redistributing it, arguing that they
> are infringing the Stanford patents.
hahahaha, this is funny if it's true... Anyone know which two patents they
are referring to? (diffie-hellman and merkle-hellman?)
Any ideas on how this will change the legal status of RSAREF and PGP?
andrew
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list