NSA, ITAR, NCSA and plug-in hooks.
jim bell
jimbell at pacifier.com
Tue Nov 14 16:11:07 PST 1995
Scott Brickner <sjb at universe.digex.net> writes:
>Jeff Barber writes:
>>Does anyone know the ostensible justification for this? What section of
>>the ITARs do they point to when they say "this is illegal"? I've perused
>>an online copy of ITAR (no, I haven't read all of it -- I have other
>>things I want to do this year :-), but I can't find a section that could
>>be construed to support this contention.
>
>I think it's 121.1, Category XIII paragraph (b) item (5):
>"Ancillary equipment specifically designed or modified for paragraphs (b)
>(1), (2), (3), (4) and (5) of this category;"
Question: What makes computers in general NOT describable by such a
paragraph?!?
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list