NSA, ITAR, NCSA and plug-in hooks.

James Black black at sunflash.eng.usf.edu
Tue Nov 14 12:17:24 PST 1995


Hello,

On Tue, 14 Nov 1995, Jeff Barber wrote:

> s1113645 at tesla.cc.uottawa.ca writes:
> 
> Does anyone know the ostensible justification for this?  What section of
> the ITARs do they point to when they say "this is illegal"?  I've perused
> an online copy of ITAR (no, I haven't read all of it -- I have other
> things I want to do this year :-), but I can't find a section that could
> be construed to support this contention.

  I scanned through the ITAR, and I agree that there doesn't seem to be 
anything about hooks that are illegal, but the NSA does have the 
authority to protect whatever threatens national security.  If they are 
over-stepping their bounds who is going to push it to court to find out, 
as that is where the decision would have to be made (very expensive).
  Take care and have fun.

James Black







More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list