Many Topics are Appropriate for Discussion Here

[John Curtis]

Nothing ventured, nothing gained.  I don't mind reading serious
questions no matter how naive, provided that the questioner is
willing to listen to the responses no matter how acerbic.
You would have to have a pretty thick skin to post here frequently.
----------
From: 	Futplex[SMTP:futplex at pseudonym.com]
Sent: 	Friday, November 03, 1995 2:30 PM
To: 	Cypherpunks Mailing List
Subject: 	Re: Many Topics are Appropriate for Discussion Here

I have some not-so-hypothetical questions: 

Suppose I have serious and plausibly realistic aspirations to become an 
authority in some subtopic of cryptography, network security, etc. (sometime 
well into the next millenium). Am I more likely to learn and hone my skills
by actively participating (sticking my neck out) or merely lurking
indefinitely ?  Regardless of the answer to the previous question, should
the list suffer me my missteps and naivete ?

I do not consider these questions rhetorical, and the answers are very
important to me on a personal level.

And now I believe I'll shut up for a while.

-Futplex <futplex at pseudonym.com>


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: bin00000.bin
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 2067 bytes
Desc: "application/ms-tnef"
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks-legacy/attachments/19951104/ba26d711/attachment.bin>