"Dr." Fred

[Michael Shields]

In article <199511010235.DAA00908 at utopia.hacktic.nl>,
Anonymous <anon-remailer at utopia.hacktic.nl> wrote:
> The difference, of course, is that its almost impossible
> to have sympathy for Dr. Fred. His hustle is for a hell
> of a lot more than subsistence. He was also never actually
> a master of his field, a fact that becomes increasingly
> obvious as our exposure to him goes on. Now he's reduced
> himself to trying to collect someone else's winnings.

So, what part of your analogy was valid?
-- 
Shields.