The question is moot: (Was: Not crypto, but scary.)

Thomas Grant Edwards tedwards at src.umd.edu
Fri Feb 10 11:08:17 PST 1995

Previous message: Not moot? [Was Re: The question is moot: (Was: Not crypto, but scary.)]
Next message: Meeting Anncouncement for Sat. Feb. 11 1995 SF Bay Area Meeting
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, 10 Feb 1995, Black Unicorn wrote:

[about HR 666]

> The bill is really just a restatement.  This has been the state of the 
> law for 11 years now.

Right - it is time to change the law.  HR 666 won't help in that direction.


-Thomas

Previous message: Not moot? [Was Re: The question is moot: (Was: Not crypto, but scary.)]
Next message: Meeting Anncouncement for Sat. Feb. 11 1995 SF Bay Area Meeting
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list