S. 314 and existing situation

Thomas Grant Edwards tedwards at src.umd.edu
Thu Feb 9 09:55:25 PST 1995


On Wed, 8 Feb 1995, Richard F. Dutcher wrote:

> Gee, fellas, looking over this bill, *most* of what's going on is
> just porting existing telephone law over to cybercomm. Given the
> existence of 900-sex-talk, the phone companies are clearly not being
> held responsible for content.

Doesn't the common carrier status of RBOCs give them protection from 
this?

-Thomas







More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list