S. 314 and existing situation
Thomas Grant Edwards
tedwards at src.umd.edu
Thu Feb 9 09:55:25 PST 1995
On Wed, 8 Feb 1995, Richard F. Dutcher wrote:
> Gee, fellas, looking over this bill, *most* of what's going on is
> just porting existing telephone law over to cybercomm. Given the
> existence of 900-sex-talk, the phone companies are clearly not being
> held responsible for content.
Doesn't the common carrier status of RBOCs give them protection from
this?
-Thomas
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list