Web O Trust, active attacks against same, etc. AGAIN. (was: Usability of Cryptography (was Re: More FUD from First Virtual) )

James A. Donald jamesd at echeque.com
Fri Dec 15 10:16:23 PST 1995


At 01:39 PM 12/13/95 -0700, Bryce wrote:
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> An entity calling itself "James A. Donald" <jamesd at echeque.com> 
>allegedly wrote:
>>
>> Web of trust is a mess because it attempts to link keys to 
>> physical people, which in general cannot be done.
>                   *******************************
>
>
>Do you wish to substantiate this rather brazen assertion?  
>I am very sure that PGP public key 0xCC56B2E9 belongs to my
>housemate Sebastian Kuzminsky <kuzminsk at colorado.edu>.  Is
>there some reason why I should doubt this belief?

No, but there is some reason you should gain familiarity with 
the english language

If I had intended to say "generally cannot be done"  I would have
said "generally cannot be done" instead of saying "in general cannot 
be done"



 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
              				|  
We have the right to defend ourselves	|   http://www.jim.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind	|  
of animals that we are. True law	|   James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the	|  
arbitrary power of the state.		|   jamesd at echeque.com







More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list