[NOISE] Re: Netscape announces position against GAK

[Anonymous]

On 14 Dec 1995 08:20:46, amp <Alan.Pugh at internetMCI.COM> writes (in part):

>i'm not entirely satisfied with netscape's response, but then, i
>didn't expect to be. i _expect_ weasling from corporations that have
>made the 'big time'. this is the way life is i suppose. what i'd like
>to see would be more companies that have an interest in the security
--snip--
>amp
><0003701548 at mcimail.com> (since 10/31/88)
><alan.pugh at internetmci.com>
>Current PGP Key = 57957C9D
>December 13, 1995   18:51

i cannot fault you too much for not using capitals, since it is a well know
fact  that network mci charges extra for their use.  however, i do believe
that your posts might be taken more seriously were they easier to read.
maybe it is time to shell out the extra $$ and buy some capital letters.

        hooker