GAK and self-incrimination?

[Futplex]

Greg Broiles writes:
> But it seems to me that the real bottom line is that the information which
> is compelled is not incriminating, and the information which is
> incriminating is not compelled. The keys to my crypto might lead to
> incriminating evidence, or they might prove to be useful in a prosecution,
> but they're not in themselves any sort of a signal that a crime has been or
> will be committed.

Written half in jest: Well, the cries from the TLAs of "Why do you want to
use cryptography ?  What do you have to hide ?" notwithstanding....

-Futplex <futplex at pseudonym.com>