Solution for US/Foreign Software?

[Timothy C. May]

At 8:06 AM 12/6/95, jim bell wrote:

>>"Crypto hooks," basically the scheme you are proposing, were thought of by
>>the authorities and are not a bypass of the crypto export laws.
>>--Tim May
>
>
>I'm not saying they are a "bypass" of the laws.  Rather, I'm saying that
>if the goal is to:
>
>1.  Let companies like Netscape make foreign sales.
>
>2.  Still comply with the letter of the law.
>

And I'm saying that your proposal does NOT comply with the letter of the
law. There's no point in arguing this, as the facts are clear. Consult the
ITARs and the previous discussions here and elsewhere on the practice of
leaving "hooks" that crypto modules can later be attached to.


>If the USG tries to take the position that "any program which can be
>modified into another program that gets around GAK is prohibited from
>export," then they're going to have to stop allowing the export of
>pre-formatted floppy disks because they're likewise an XOR away from PGP.
>
>So we're back to square one:  Does the USG intend to allow ANY programs to
>be exported?

No, the USG has not (yet at least) prohibited export of blank programs or
disks. The "no hooks" rule has some ambiguities, but is by no means quite
this dumb.

All I'm saying is that you need to look at what the laws are, and how they
have affected existing products and companies, before announcing a
"solution."

--Tim May

Views here are not the views of my Internet Service Provider or Government.
---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:----
Timothy C. May              | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money,
tcmay at got.net  408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero
Corralitos, CA              | knowledge, reputations, information markets,
Higher Power: 2^756839      | black markets, collapse of governments.
"National borders are just speed bumps on the information superhighway."