On the crime bill and remailers

Alex Strasheim alex at omaha.com
Tue Sep 20 16:19:33 PDT 1994


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Hal said:

> I strongly disagree with this.  Anonymous remailers as presently
> constructed will be almost completely ineffective against any significant
> government attempts to surveil email traffic.  The government does have
> the resources today to defeat most uses of remailers.  Since present-day
> remailers lack padding features, the correspondence between incoming and
> outgoing messages, even with encryption, is relatively easy to establish. 
> This is made worse by the lack of general support for reordering, which
> renders the task almost trivial. 

Although it does seem that the government ought to be able to track
remailer traffic, is there any evidence that they are actually doing it in
the real world?  I've seen posts on usenet which would have presumably 
provoked a reaction from police, but I can't remember hearing of any 
cases in which such surveilance occured.

==
Alex Strasheim
alex at omaha.com


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.1

iQCVAwUBLn9tpREpP7+baaPtAQHrewQAvJW8zUIQb57XwHHsdGC7gJo9UyFfds4o
hu1vTUEsZvzyYJL7BIVgDEnHowVZ6vWyKky2QW+CiYli6Ulo8zFN5zoeWS09vLx2
/pANQPxXC+o61C1rypiR85D/esJ7a7ZRJu8OI5sa98+eLmDDad/j/768OMmFwR8c
iI8ZnV2PCbQ=
=DwQt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list