Transparent Email

[John Young]

Responding to msg by eric at remailer.net (Eric Hughes) on Mon, 28 
Nov  9:54 PM


>I am still considering the "sign-or-delay" proposal for 
>the toad.com
>server, that is, sign your articles to the list or 
>they'll be delayed
>and eventually rejected.


Does not everyone get a complete header like the one below from 
Eric's post with incoming mail?  This is presented 
automagically by The Pipeline's system.

I had assumed that because every mail received here has such a 
header that everyone else could also see who sent my mail, 
signed or not.  That is why I have not signed my posts.

BTW, Pipeline does not allow anonymously-sent direct mail -- as 
a take it or leave it policy.  So we cannot manipulate headers 
to forge from this Windows-driven end.


John Young (redundantly, I thought)



>From owner-cypherpunks at toad.com Tue Nov 29 00:01 EST 
>1994
>   Received: from relay2.UU.NET (relay2.UU.NET 
>[192.48.96.7]) by pipeline.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) with ESMTP 
>id AAA09928 for <jya at pipeline.com>; Tue, 29 Nov 1994 
>00:01:20 -0500
>Received: from toad.com by relay2.UU.NET with SMTP 
>	id QQxsbj13332; Mon, 28 Nov 1994 23:59:02 -0500
>Received: by toad.com id AA15623; Mon, 28 Nov 94 
>20:55:57 PST
>Received: from largo.remailer.net ([204.94.187.1]) by 
>toad.com id AA15611; Mon, 28 Nov 94 20:55:29 PST
>Received: (from eric at localhost) by largo.remailer.net 
>(8.6.8/8.6.6) id VAA02536; Mon, 28 Nov 1994 21:54:14 
>-0800
>Date: Mon, 28 Nov 1994 21:54:14 -0800
>Message-Id: <199411290554.VAA02536 at largo.remailer.net>
>To: cypherpunks at toad.com
>In-Reply-To: <199411282330.RAA00186 at omaha.omaha.com> 
>(message from Alex Strasheim on Mon, 28 Nov 1994 
>17:30:22 -0600 (CST))
>Subject: Re: Transparent Email
>From: eric at remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
>Sender: owner-cypherpunks at toad.com
>Precedence: bulk
>Content-Type: text
>Content-Length: 6504