Transparent Email
Hal
hfinney at shell.portal.com
Tue Nov 29 10:15:07 PST 1994
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Alex Strasheim <alex at omaha.com> writes:
>I think it's a bad idea to require signatures on the list, or even to
>penalize people who don't use them. People aren't signing their posts
>because it's too much of a hassle to do it from a dial up, netcom style,
>account, not because they're insufficiently committed to the cause.
>It seems to me that such a rule would stifle discussion and encourage
>people to store their keys on insecure accounts.
Just create a special key for your netcom account. Use no pass phrase;
using one would give a misleading sense of security IMO. Just pass your
mail through "pgp -saft" or equivalent and you've got it. It is easy to
do this from most editors.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6
iQBVAwUBLttXrxnMLJtOy9MBAQHPNgIAu42vPelscZqT7yQkY08NtOw6XGdNciXI
WBVXvgRsRdzIoH7GPbHUIPBVXbPNuZ6zDYzbazmSr+Z2tErY9qTHBw==
=wqC5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list