White Knight Remailers
Adam Shostack
adam at bwh.harvard.edu
Wed Nov 23 04:37:02 PST 1994
| Adam Shostack writes:
| [oddly, I never received the original copy of this; I seem to be missing
| list messages with increasing frequency recently :( ]
| > Real remailers (with return address features) should probably
| > be advertised in alt.support.* and alt.recovery, in order to build a
| > class of "good" users for them. [...]
When I wrote this, I did not mean to claim that remailers w/o return
addresses are not real. I meant to say that remailers that rely on
operator screning & approval of messages are not what I consider real
remailers.
Adam
--
"It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once."
-Hume
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list