PGP 2.6 is dangerous in the long term ?
Ezekial Palmer
an60011 at anon.penet.fi
Tue May 24 22:25:02 PDT 1994
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
From: mgream at acacia.itd.uts.edu.au (Matthew Gream)
Subject: PGP 2.6 is dangerous in the long term ?
Date: Wed, 25 May 94 12:43:46 EST
Being Australian, I've not read the RSAREF conditions, but there is at
the point that commercial use will still not be possible (at it would
be under non-RSAREF 2.3a) when the RSA patent expires.
The GNU copyleft is supposed to disallow a lot of for-profit uses.
Zeke
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.3a
iQCVAgUBLeK/+xVg/9j67wWxAQGNqgP9FrqJ77ru0vH6mii7m9AElRfdqLvrFuum
7pRINtNpyW9qLtU8cQbdriAWJaxZX7CK70XkHPiSOXaIJ/A+pWrp4VW0f2F9vGBX
W3HkERqGT9ikOxDVHAq5Qk3IvvXss+Ms+QdzGSDRK1bAgzJLH/YYbsdpsXW4+fgi
raltpxGcZvg=
=i4MI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list