compatibility with future PGP
Adam Shostack
adam at bwh.harvard.edu
Tue May 24 13:42:11 PDT 1994
Perry writes:
| In any case, I don't understand why anyone would rationally oppose the
| distribution of Pr0duct Cypher's patches -- you don't have to use them
| if you don't like.
I wasn't opposing them; I was suggesting that patching 2.5
would be more productive in the long run than patching 2.3
Adam
--
Adam Shostack adam at bwh.harvard.edu
Politics. From the greek "poly," meaning many, and ticks, a small,
annoying bloodsucker.
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list